Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284901›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The impact of hedonic social media use during microbreaks on employee resources recovery.

Jaroslaw Grobelny, Marta Glinka, Teresa Chirkowska-Smolak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaroslaw GrobelnyWork and Organizational Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89AB, 61-578, Poznań, Poland. jaroslaw.grobelny@amu.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-402X
Marta GlinkaWork and Organizational Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89AB, 61-578, Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-9656-2495
Teresa Chirkowska-SmolakWork and Organizational Psychology Department, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89AB, 61-578, Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3942-5594

Funding

Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University 081/04/UAM/Y020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of social media-related microbreaks on the resource recovery of employees. Specifically, we examined whether or not the brief, hedonic use of social media through algorithmic videos could fully replenish resources, such as vigor and fatigue, that are depleted after performing clerical tasks. We also compared this form of recovery to other established microbreak activities. We used a pre-registered, mixed-method experimental design to collect data from 308 employees. A series of mixed-method ANOVA tests complemented by quadratic linear contrast terms and post-hoc analyses were performed to test hypotheses and address research questions. The findings indicate that although social media microbreaks offer a certain degree of resource replenishment, they do not provide full recovery, particularly regarding fatigue. Social media facilitate a reasonable psychological detachment but fall short in other recovery experiences. Notably, exposure to nature yielded more beneficial results. The study contributes novel insights to a field primarily focused on the negative impacts of excessive social media use and suggests that rational and brief usage can be advantageous for employee well-being.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedEmployee resourcesMicrobreakRecoverySocial media

Identifiers

PMID39284901
PMCPMC11405873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.