Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284842›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Highly efficient CRISPR-mediated genome editing through microfluidic droplet cell mechanoporation.

You-Jeong Kim, Dayoung Yun, Jungjoon K Lee, Cheulhee Jung, Aram J Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Regenerative strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Advancing Allogeneic NK Cell Immunotherapy through Microfluidic Gene Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Innovative Advances in Droplet Microfluidics.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

You-Jeong Kim *Department of Bioengineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dayoung Yun *Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungjoon K LeeDepartment of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheulhee JungDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. damo363@korea.ac.kr.
Aram J ChungDepartment of Bioengineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ac467@korea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-0222

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea) 20020278National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2021R1A2C2006224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based editing tools have transformed the landscape of genome editing. However, the absence of a robust and safe CRISPR delivery method continues to limit its potential for therapeutic applications. Despite the emergence of various methodologies aimed at addressing this challenge, issues regarding efficiency and editing operations persist. We introduce a microfluidic gene delivery system, called droplet cell pincher (DCP), designed for highly efficient and safe genome editing. This approach combines droplet microfluidics with cell mechanoporation, enabling encapsulation and controlled passage of cells and CRISPR systems through a microscale constriction. Discontinuities created in cell and nuclear membranes upon passage facilitate the rapid CRISPR-system internalization into the nucleus. We demonstrate the successful delivery of various macromolecules, including mRNAs (~98%) and plasmid DNAs (~91%), using this platform, underscoring the versatility of the DCP and leveraging it to achieve successful genome engineering through CRISPR-Cas9 delivery. Our platform outperforms electroporation, the current state-of-the-art method, in three key areas: single knockouts (~6.5-fold), double knockouts (~3.8-fold), and knock-ins (~3.8-fold). These results highlight the potential of our platform as a next-generation tool for CRISPR engineering, with implications for clinical and biological cell-based research.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsElectroporationGene Transfer TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansMicrofluidicsPlasmids

Identifiers

PMID39284842
PMCPMC11405868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.