Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284744›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2024

Modeling cheatgrass distribution, abundance, and response to climate change as a function of soil microclimate.

Tyson J Terry, Stuart P Hardegree, Peter B Adler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling cheatgrass distribution, abundance, and response to climate change as a function of soil microclimate.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tyson J TerryDepartment of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-0671
Stuart P HardegreeUSDA-ARS Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise, Idaho, USA.
Peter B AdlerDepartment of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-4009

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exotic annual grass invasions in water-limited systems cause degradation of native plant and animal communities and increased fire risk. The life history of invasive annual grasses allows for high sensitivity to interannual variability in weather. Current distribution and abundance models derived from remote sensing, however, provide only a coarse understanding of how species respond to weather, making it difficult to anticipate how climate change will affect vulnerability to invasion. Here, we derived germination covariates (rate sums) from mechanistic germination and soil microclimate models to quantify the favorability of soil microclimate for cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) establishment and growth across 30 years at 2662 sites across the sagebrush steppe system in the western United States. Our approach, using four bioclimatic covariates alone, predicted cheatgrass distribution with accuracy comparable to previous models fit using many years of remotely-sensed imagery. Accuracy metrics from our out-of-sample testing dataset indicate that our model predicted distribution well (72% overall accuracy) but explained patterns of abundance poorly (R

Indexed as

Climate ChangeMicroclimateModels, BiologicalSoilBromusIntroduced SpeciesPlant DispersalSoilannual grassbiological invasionBromus tectorumgerminationrate sumresistance and resilienceSHAW model

Identifiers

PMID39284744
PMCPMC11610693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.