Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284700›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Implementation of decarbonisation actions in general practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol.

Florence Karaba, Ana Raquel Nunes, Olivia Geddes, Helen Atherton, Frederik Dahlmann, Abi Eccles, Michael Gregg, Rachel Spencer, Helen Twohig, Jeremy Dale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florence KarabaMedical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK florence.stadler@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0006-0549-729X
Ana Raquel NunesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-3760
Olivia GeddesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Helen AthertonUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Frederik DahlmannWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abi EcclesWarwick Primary Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Michael GreggPPI co-applicant, UK.
Rachel SpencerWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2578-6954
Helen TwohigKeele University, Keele, UK.
Jeremy DaleWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-3553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing recognition of the importance of primary care in addressing climate change. The World Organisation of Family Doctors has urged general practitioners worldwide to commit to tackling climate change and to serve as agents of systemic and individual change. Though an increasing number of resources have become available to support the decarbonisation of primary care, there remains a lack of evidence about how primary care teams are using them, their reach across practices, their level of adoption and maintenance, their cost impact and their effect on carbon emissions. This systematic review aims to understand how primary care, with a focus on general practice or equivalent settings within the context of primary care, is implementing decarbonisation actions to reduce carbon emissions arising from its operations, assess efficacy of the actions and generate recommendations on how to assist and accelerate their implementation and effectiveness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The literature search will be conducted on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and ProQuest, from 2007 to 29 March 2024. Article screening will be based on specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis will be used to analyse and integrate findings to offer new insights into key mechanisms that support decarbonisation in general practice and help refine an initial programme theory. The reporting of the systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review did not involve the collection or analysis of any data that was not included in previously published research in the public domain. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023470889.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGeneral PracticePrimary Health CareHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicClimate ChangePrimary CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID39284700
PMCPMC11409232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.