ArticleBMJ open2024
Combination of exhaled breath condensate samples with lipoarabinomannan point of care assay for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis: protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2025 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe WHO estimates a gap of about 30% between the incident (10.6 million) and notified (7.5 million) cases of tuberculosis (TB). Combined with the growing recognition in prevalence surveys of the high proportion of cases identified who are asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, these data underscore how current symptom screening approaches and use of diagnostic tests with suboptimal performance on sputum miss large numbers of cases. Thus, the development of sputum-free biomarker-based tests for diagnosis is becoming necessary, which the WHO has already identified as a priority for new TB diagnostics.The objective of this study is to evaluate a combination of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan (LAM) as point-of-care (POC) assays to identify TB patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study is conducted at the TB Screening and Treatment Centre of International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, on a cohort of adults and adolescents >11 years of age. A total of 614 individuals with presumptive pulmonary TB based on TB signs, symptoms and radiography are being recruited from 28 August 2023. Spot sputum is collected for standard reference testing (L-J culture, GeneXpert MTB/Rif, acid-fast Bacilli microscopy) to fine-tune categorisation of TB disease status for each participant, defined as (1) definite TB (at least one positive standard reference test); (2) probable TB (not microbiologically confirmed but under TB treatment); (3) possible TB (no TB treatment but signs, symptoms and radiography suggestive of TB); (4) other respiratory disease (microbiologically not confirmed and no radiography presenting abnormalities compatible with TB); and (5) unknown (no microbiological evidence with normal/no TB abnormalities with radiography). Urine and EBC specimens will be subjected to LAM POC testing and biobanked for further investigation. Statistical analyses will include an assessment of diagnostic accuracy by constructing receiver operating curves and calculating sensitivity and specificity, as well as post-test probabilities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Research Review Committee as well as the Ethical Review Committee of icddr,b and recorded under a protocol reference number, PR-2301. Results will be submitted to open-access peer-reviewed journals, presented at academic meetings, and shared with national and international policymaking bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.