ArticleBMJ open2024
Occurrence of metabolic syndrome in midlife in relation to cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality-lessons from a population-based matched cohort study with 27 years follow-up.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Brain health strategies in middle-aged individuals with mild neurocognitive disorder: a scoping review.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Review
- Resistance training effects on gait parameters in older adults-a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis and meta-regression.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Modifiable Determinants of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Health Survey.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and metabolic syndrome: a large cross-section study with dose response analysis in a health screening population.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Emerging PFAS contaminants PFNA and PFSA amplify epigenetic aging: sex- and age-stratified risks in an aging population.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe examined how asymptomatic metabolic syndrome (MetS) in midlife affects cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and all-cause mortality later in life and studied difference in time to event and from the individual components related to MetS.
designPopulation-based matched cohort study including data from a screening programme for identification of CV risk factors.
settingPrimary care, County of Västmanland, Sweden.
participantsAll inhabitants turning 40 or 50 years between 1990 and 1999 were invited to a health screening. Total 34 269 (60.1%) individuals completed the health examination. Participants that met a modified definition of MetS were individually matched to two controls without MetS with regard to age, sex and date of health examination.
interventionsNone.
main outcome measuresCV events and all-cause mortality from the index examination to June 2022.
resultsAll 5084 participants with MetS were matched to two controls. There were 1645 (32.4%) CV events in the MetS group and 2321 (22.8%) CV events for controls. 1317 (25.9%) MetS and 1904 (18.7%) control subjects died. The adjusted HRs (aHR) for CV event and death were significantly higher when MetS was present (aHR) 1.39*** (95% CI 1.28 to 1.50) and 1.27*** (95% CI 1.16 to 1.40) respectively. The factor analysis identified three dominating factors: blood pressure, cholesterol and blood glucose. Mean time for first CV event and death was 2.6 years and 1.5 years shorter respectively for participants within the highest quartile compared with participants with lower mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). The aHR for each 10 mm Hg increased MAP were 1.19*** (95% CI 1.15 to 1.23) for CV event and 1.16*** (95% CI 1.11 to 1.21) for death.
conclusionThe risk of a CV event and premature death is significantly increased when MetS is present. Early detection of metabolic risk factors, especially, high blood pressure, opens a window of opportunity to introduce preventive treatment to reduce CV morbidity and all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.