Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284689›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024

Flight activity and effort of breeding pied flycatchers in the wild, revealed with accelerometers and machine learning.

Hui Yu, Shujie Liang, Florian T Muijres, Jan Severin Te Lindert, Henrik J de Knegt, Anders Hedenström, Koosje P Lamers, Per Henningsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hui YuExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-0950
Shujie LiangShan Shui Conservation Center, Beijing, China.
Florian T MuijresExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5668-0653
Jan Severin Te LindertExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3664-7274
Henrik J de KnegtWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-6970
Anders HedenströmDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Naturvetarvägen 6A, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1757-0945
Koosje P LamersConservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9965-7245
Per HenningssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Naturvetarvägen 6A, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-1067

Funding

Lunds UniversitetNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWOP.171Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VI.Vidi.193.054Swedish Research Council 2018-04292Vetenskapsrådet 2020-03707Wageningen University and ResearchWageningen University and Research Next Level Animal Sciences (NLAS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight behaviours of birds have been extensively studied from different angles such as their kinematics, aerodynamics and, more generally, their migration patterns. Nevertheless, much is still unknown about the daily foraging flight activity and behaviour of breeding birds, and potential differences among males and females. The recent development of miniaturized accelerometers allows us a glimpse into the daily life of a songbird. Here, we tagged 13 male and 13 female pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) with accelerometers and used machine learning approaches to analyse their flight activity and effort during the chick rearing period. We found that during 2 h of foraging, chick-rearing pied flycatchers were flying on average 13.7% of the time. Almost all flights (>99%) were short flights lasting less than 10 s. Flight activity changed throughout the day and was highest in the morning and lowest in the early afternoon. Male pied flycatchers had lower wing loading than females, and in-flight accelerations were inversely correlated with wing loading. Despite this, we found no significant differences in flight duration and intensity between sexes. This suggests that males possess a higher potential flight performance, which they did not fully utilize during foraging flights.

Indexed as

AccelerometryFlight, AnimalMachine LearningAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleMaleSongbirdsForagingForest habitatMorphologyParental careVeDBAWing loading

Identifiers

PMID39284689
PMCPMC11491815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.