Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284675›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Persistent Impact of Prior Experience on Spatial Learning.

Michelle P Awh, Kenneth W Latimer, Nan Zhou, Zachary M Leveroni, Anna G Poon, Zoe M Stephens, Jai Y Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle P AwhNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Kenneth W LatimerNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Nan ZhouDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2243-9239
Zachary M LeveroniDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Anna G PoonData Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Zoe M StephensUniversity of Chicago Laboratory Schools, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Jai Y YuNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 jaiyu@uchicago.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-2531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to solve a new problem involves identifying the operating rules, which can be accelerated if known rules generalize in the new context. We ask how prior experience affects learning a new rule that is distinct from known rules. We examined how rats learned a new spatial navigation task after having previously learned tasks with different navigation rules. The new task differed from the previous tasks in spatial layout and navigation rule. We found that experience history did not impact overall performance. However, by examining navigation choice sequences in the new task, we found experience-dependent differences in exploration patterns during early stages of learning, as well as differences in the types of errors made during stable performance. The differences were consistent with the animals adopting experience-dependent memory strategies to discover and implement the new rule. Our results indicate prior experience shapes the strategies for solving novel problems, and the impact of prior experience remains persistent.

Indexed as

Rats, Long-EvansSpatial LearningAnimalsExploratory BehaviorMaleRatsSpatial Navigationbehaviorgeneralizationlearningspatial navigationstrategytransfer

Identifiers

PMID39284675
PMCPMC11419697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.