Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284619›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2024

High stakes slow responding, but do not help overcome Pavlovian biases in humans.

Johannes Algermissen, Hanneke E M den Ouden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johannes AlgermissenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands johannes.algermissen@donders.ru.nl hanneke.denouden@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-7069
Hanneke E M den OudenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands johannes.algermissen@donders.ru.nl hanneke.denouden@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-5130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Pavlovian" or "motivational" biases are the phenomenon that the valence of prospective outcomes modulates action invigoration: the prospect of reward invigorates actions, while the prospect of punishment suppresses actions. Effects of the valence of prospective outcomes are well established, but it remains unclear how the magnitude of outcomes ("stake magnitude") modulates these biases. In this preregistered study (

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalMotivationRewardAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformancePunishmentReaction TimeReinforcement, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39284619
PMCPMC11407693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.