ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Brain tumor segmentation by combining MultiEncoder UNet with wavelet fusion.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-level channel-spatial attention and light-weight scale-fusion network (MCSLF-Net): multi-level channel-spatial attention and light-weight scale-fusion transformer for 3D brain tumor segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Brain tumor segmentation by combining MultiEncoder UNet with wavelet fusion.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAccurate segmentation of brain tumors from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds significant importance in clinical diagnosis and surgical intervention, while current deep learning methods cope with situations of multimodal MRI by an early fusion strategy that implicitly assumes that the modal relationships are linear, which tends to ignore the complementary information between modalities, negatively impacting the model's performance. Meanwhile, long-range relationships between voxels cannot be captured due to the localized character of the convolution procedure.
methodAiming at this problem, we propose a multimodal segmentation network based on a late fusion strategy that employs multiple encoders and a decoder for the segmentation of brain tumors. Each encoder is specialized for processing distinct modalities. Notably, our framework includes a feature fusion module based on a 3D discrete wavelet transform aimed at extracting complementary features among the encoders. Additionally, a 3D global context-aware module was introduced to capture the long-range dependencies of tumor voxels at a high level of features. The decoder combines fused and global features to enhance the network's segmentation performance.
resultOur proposed model is experimented on the publicly available BraTS2018 and BraTS2021 datasets. The experimental results show competitiveness with state-of-the-art methods.
conclusionThe results demonstrate that our approach applies a novel concept for multimodal fusion within deep neural networks and delivers more accurate and promising brain tumor segmentation, with the potential to assist physicians in diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.