Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284228›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Is an all-phase ITV (internal target volume) a gold standard in the target definition of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Rishabh Kumar, Anil Gupta, Bhaskar Vishwanathan, Rose Kamal, Deepak Thaper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-contrast 4DMR via MR multitasking: Early clinical experience and implication for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rishabh KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Anil GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Subharti Institute of Cancer Management and Research, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-9413
Bhaskar VishwanathanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Rose KamalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Deepak ThaperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a well-recognized treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to the inherent motion of liver tumors, effective motion management is crucial for successful SABR. In the motion-encompassing motion management technique, all 10 respiratory phase image datasets are delineated and designated as the internal target volume (ITV). Some treatment centers use single or combination image sets to delineate the target volume. This study determines which specialty image set most closely matches an all-phase ITV contour on a synchronized contrast-enhanced 4DCT. MATERIALS AND

methodsSynchronized 4DCT contrast and delayed scans were acquired for 10 patients in the study. The maximum intensity projection (MiP), average intensity projection (AvgIP), and minimum intensity projection (MinIP) images were generated. The ITV delineation was done in all 10 phases (ITV_all_phase). The ITV_2phase combines the peak inhale and exhale phase, ITV_2 M combines MiP and MinIP, and ITV_3 M combines MiP, MinIP, and AvgIP. All ITVs were compared to ITV_all_phase with Dice similarity index (DSI) and volumes.

resultsUsing ITV_all_phase as the reference, the DSI and the mean ITV volumes for the different ITVs were as follows: ITV_all_phase (1 and 116.69 cc), ITV_2phase (0.87 and 105.27 cc), MiP (0.76 and 98.24 cc), AvgIP (0.72 and 94.54 cc), ITV_MinIP (0.67 and 81.08 cc), ITV_2 M (0.84 and 106.26 cc), and ITV_3 M (0.86 and 112.51 cc).

conclusionThe study demonstrates that in the motion-encompassing technique of motion management, the target volume generated by delineating all phases of 4DCT provides the most accurate representation for patients with HCC. Specialty image sets and their combinations, while sometimes close, tend to result in less accurate targeting. Hence, the all-phase 4DCT method should be preferred to avoid geographical misses and ensure optimal treatment outcomes. However, our conclusion may be limited by the technique we employed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyLiver NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrognosisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedReference StandardsRespirationfour‐dimensional computed tomographyhepatocellular carcinomaimage‐guidedliver neoplasmsorgan motionradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39284228
PMCPMC11633802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.