Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284170›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2024

Data Integrity Issues With Web-Based Studies: An Institutional Example of a Widespread Challenge.

Blandine French, Camilla Babbage, Katherine Bird, Lauren Marsh, Mirabel Pelton, Shireen Patel, Sarah Cassidy, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Patterns of Self-Harm in Autistic Adults Using the Card Sort Task for Self-Harm.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Too good to be true: Hidden challenges of online research recruitment.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blandine FrenchSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-5919
Camilla BabbageSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6337-3352
Katherine BirdSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1749-1673
Lauren MarshSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6021-4383
Mirabel PeltonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-8944
Shireen PatelSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5537-0717
Sarah CassidySchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1982-3034
Stefan Rennick-EgglestoneSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4187-011X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on the growing issues experienced when conducting web-based-based research. Nongenuine participants, repeat responders, and misrepresentation are common issues in health research posing significant challenges to data integrity. A summary of existing data on the topic and the different impacts on studies is presented. Seven case studies experienced by different teams within our institutions are then reported, primarily focused on mental health research. Finally, strategies to combat these challenges are presented, including protocol development, transparent recruitment practices, and continuous data monitoring. These strategies and challenges impact the entire research cycle and need to be considered prior to, during, and post data collection. With a lack of current clear guidelines on this topic, this report attempts to highlight considerations to be taken to minimize the impact of such challenges on researchers, studies, and wider research. Researchers conducting web-based research must put mitigating strategies in place, and reporting on mitigation efforts should be mandatory in grant applications and publications to uphold the credibility of web-based research.

Indexed as

InternetBiomedical ResearchData CollectionHumansdata integrity, misrepresentationmental healthqualitative studiessurveysweb-based researchweb-based studies

Identifiers

PMID39284170
PMCPMC11443183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.