ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
CSF Susceptibility Variation in Patient With Intracranial Hemorrhage: Implications for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reference Selection.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an emerging MRI technique with multiple clinical applications. As tissue susceptibility cannot be directly measured using MRI, QSM imaging techniques must indirectly compute susceptibility values, requiring regularization methods. CSF is a popular choice for regularization due to its near water susceptibility in healthy controls. However, the impact of pus, elevated protein, or blood dissolved in CSF on QSM regularization is not well defined.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on selecting CSF as reference for QSM imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 87 subjects, 53 with ICH (5 intraventricular, 19 subarachnoid, 27 both, and 2 intraparenchymal only) and 37 without hemorrhage (27 with MS, 10 without MS), were included in this study. Imaging was performed using 3D multiecho gradient echo, FLAIR, and multiecho complex total field inversion (mcTFI) at 3 T. McTFI with and without CSF zero-referencing regularization was generated from the 3DMEGRE data and reviewed with FLAIR images. Regions of hemorrhagic (H+) and nonhemorrhagic (H-) CSF were manually selected in reference to head CT and FLAIR images by a PGY III diagnostic radiology resident and Certificate of Added Qualification-certified neuroradiologist with 10 years' experience. Paired Student t test and one-way ANOVA were used with post hoc multicomparisons. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsAreas of H- CSF were noted to have higher regularized QSM values in subjects with ICH relative to subjects without. Unregularized H- QSM values were also noted to have a systematically higher value in ICH subjects relative to subjects without blood. Subjects with MS and without ICH did not show significant difference in H- CSF regularized or unregularized QSM values.
conclusionsQSM values of areas suggested to not have hemorrhage on other imaging showed significantly higher QSM values in ICH subjects relative to subjects without ICH. Additionally, areas of hemorrhage did not show significant QSM value difference between regularized and unregularized QSM images. These findings suggest that, in subjects with any area of ICH, QSM values for no-hemorrhagic areas may be significantly altered using CSF regularization relative to subjects without ICH, with implications for intra- and intersubject QSM value analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.