ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: Defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful radiosurgery for a growing vestibular schwannoma following partial resection of an ipsilateral transfundal inner ear schwannoma and cochlear implantation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Article
- Pseudoprogression in Koos grade 4 vestibular schwannomas following stereotactic radiosurgery: temporal dynamics and radiological predictors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Early cystic enlargement of hypoglossal schwannoma causing brainstem compression post-Gamma Knife radiosurgery: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumor growth after stereotactic surgery in vestibular schwannoma: a volumetric and clinical trajectory analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- The evolution of stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: recent evidence and outcomes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Reirradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Review
- A retrospective study demonstrating the growth patterns and the pseudoprogression temporal classification after stereotactic radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emerging strategies for the prediction of behaviour, growth, and treatment response in vestibular schwannoma.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Review
- Management of hydrocephalus associated with large vestibular schwannomas.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- A volume-conformity paradoxon: Volumetric determinants of treatment success/failure following stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of the evolution of tumor volume and characterize volumetric patterns.
methodsWe included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of a minimum of 3 years. A clustering was performed in 2 steps: Definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, and then the assignment of the remaining patients on a best-fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (adjusted rand index and normalized mutual information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.
resultsA total of 1607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with 1 pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were as follows: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.
conclusionsThe definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help the physicians tremendously to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.