Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283961›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

The effect of fixed and functional remodelling on conduction velocity, wavefront propagation, and rotational activity formation in atrial fibrillation.

Shohreh Honarbakhsh, Caterina Vidal Horrach, Pier D Lambiase, Caroline Roney, Ross J Hunter

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07726901 (Empirical Anatomy-Based Ablation vs Emphasize Map-Guided Substrate Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07726901 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Empirical Anatomy-Based Ablation vs Emphasize Map-Guided Substrate Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation : (COMPASS-AF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2026 to 2030Enrolled360ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation (AF)ArmsAnatomy-based ablation, Emphasize map-guided ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ganglionated plexi ablation impact on atrial fibrillation mechanisms and outcomes in patients with low scar burden.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shohreh HonarbakhshWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-5739
Caterina Vidal HorrachWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Pier D LambiaseElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-9267
Caroline RoneyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-0928
Ross J HunterElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4641-3279

Funding

BHF Clinical Intermediate Fellowship FS/ICRF/22/26034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. Interactions between scar and conduction velocity (CV) and their impact on wavefront propagation in sinus rhythm (SR) and rotational activity burden in AF were evaluated. METHODS AND

resultsLocal activation times (LATs) and voltage data were obtained from patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. Omnipolar voltage (OV) and bipolar voltage (BV) data were obtained during AF and SR at pacing intervals of 600 and 250 ms. Local activation times were used to determine CV dynamics and their relationship to the underlying voltage and pivot points in SR. Computational modelling studies were performed to evaluate the impact of CVs and fibrosis on rotational activity burden in AF. Data from 60 patients with a total of 2 768 400 LAT and voltage points were analysed (46 140 ± 5689 points/patient). Voltage determined CV dynamics. Enhanced CV heterogeneity sites were predominantly mapped to low-voltage zones (LVZs) (0.2-0.49 mV) (128/168, 76.2%) rather than LVZs (<0.2 mV) and frequently co-located to pivot points (151/168, 89.9%). Atrial fibrillation OV maps correlated better with SR BV 250 ms than 600 ms maps, thereby representing fixed and functional remodelling. Sinus rhythm maps at 250 ms compared with 600 ms harboured a greater number of pivot points. Increased CV slowing and functional remodelling on computational models resulted in a greater rotational activity burden.

conclusionConduction velocity dynamics are impacted by the degree of scar. Conduction velocity heterogeneity and functional remodelling impacts wavefront propagation in SR and rotational activity burden in AF. This study provides insight into the pathophysiology of AF and identifies potential novel ablation targets.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial RemodelingCatheter AblationAction PotentialsAgedCicatrixComputer SimulationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleFibrosisHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, CardiovascularAtrial fibrillationConduction velocityFunctional remodellingPivot pointsScar

Identifiers

PMID39283961
PMCPMC11481322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.