Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283907›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Experimental study on the various varieties of photovoltaic panels (PVs) cooling systems to increase their electrical efficiency.

Ali Basem, Azfarizal Mukhtar, Zakaria Mohamed Salem Elbarbary, Farruh Atamurotov, Natei Ermias Benti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali BasemAir Conditioning Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Warith Al-Anbiyaa University, Karbala, Iraq.
Azfarizal MukhtarInstitute of Sustainable Energy, Putrajaya Campus, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7792-0767
Zakaria Mohamed Salem ElbarbaryElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Farruh AtamurotovNew Uzbekistan University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Natei Ermias BentiComputational Data Science Program, College of Computational and Natural Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-6944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of cooling methods on the electrical efficiency of photovoltaic panels (PVs). The efficiency of four cooling techniques is experimentally analyzed. The most effective approach is identified as water-spray cooling on the front surface of PVs, which increases efficiency by 3.9% compared to the case without cooling. The results show that water-spray cooling raises the PV's temperature to 41°C, while improving its average daytime efficiency to 22%. Air-cooling, water-cooling in the tubes behind the PV, and aluminum oxide-water nanofluid cooling in the tubes behind the PV improve efficiency by 1.1%, 1.9%, and 2.7%, respectively. The findings highlight the potential of water-spray cooling as a cost-effective and efficient method to enhance PV efficiency and contribute to the global effort towards renewable energy.

Indexed as

Solar EnergyAluminum OxideCold TemperatureElectricityElectric Power SuppliesWaterAluminum OxideWater

Identifiers

PMID39283907
PMCPMC11404811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.