Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283903›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Lessons learned from the MOMENT study on how to recruit and retain a target population online, across borders, and with automated remote data collection.

Andrew Belfiglio, Shayleigh Dickson Page, Sara Pettersson, Michelle van Rijn, Ercole Vellone, Heleen Westland, Kenneth E Freedland, Christopher Lee, Anna Strömberg, Douglas Wiebe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrew BelfiglioUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-4071-5178
Shayleigh Dickson PageUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Sara PetterssonLinköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Michelle van RijnUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-3678-3299
Ercole VelloneTor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-7473
Heleen WestlandUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7366-5773
Kenneth E FreedlandWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-9913
Christopher LeeBoston College Connell School of Nursing, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Anna StrömbergLinköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Douglas WiebeUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Subhash AryalUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Barbara RiegelUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Tiny JaarsmaLinköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, studies use social media to recruit, enroll, and collect data from participants. This introduces a threat to data integrity: efforts to produce fraudulent data to receive participant compensation, e.g., gift cards. MOMENT is an online symptom-monitoring and self-care study that implemented safeguards to protect data integrity. Facebook, Twitter, and patient organizations were used to recruit participants with chronic health conditions in four countries (USA, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden). Links to the REDCap baseline survey were posted to social media accounts. The initial study launch, where participants completed the baseline survey and were automatically re-directed to the LifeData ecological momentary assessment app, was overwhelmed with fraudulent responses. In response, safeguards (e.g., reCAPTCHA, attention checks) were implemented and baseline data was manually inspected prior to LifeData enrollment. The initial launch resulted in 411 responses in 48 hours, 265 of which (64.5%) successfully registered for the LifeData app and were considered enrolled. Ninety-nine percent of these were determined to be fraudulent. Following implementation of safeguards, the re-launch yielded 147 completed baselines in 3.5 months. Eighteen cases (12.2%) were found fraudulent and not invited to enroll. Most fraudulent cases in the re-launch (15 of 18) were identified by a single attention check question. In total, 96.1% of fraudulent responses were to the USA-based survey. Data integrity safeguards are necessary for research studies that recruit online and should be reported in manuscripts. Three safeguard strategies were effective in preventing and removing most of the fraudulent data in the MOMENT study. Additional strategies were also used and may be necessary in other contexts.

Indexed as

Data CollectionSocial MediaAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39283903
PMCPMC11404800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.