Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283873›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Impact of non-invasive oxygen reserve index versus standard SpO2 monitoring on peripheral oxygen saturation during endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: Protocol for the randomized controlled trial NESOI2.

Hugo Hille, Aurélie Le Thuaut, Pierre Asfar, Quentin Quelven, Emmanuelle Mercier, Anthony Le Meur, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Virginie Lemiale, Grégoire Muller, Martin Cour and 16 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05867875 (Impact of the Non-invasive Oxygen-reserve-index), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05867875 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of the Non-invasive Oxygen-reserve-index (ORI) Versus Standard of Care on Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) During Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) in Intensive Care Unit: Randomised Superiority Multi-center 2 Arms, Open Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled950ConditionsIntensive Care UnitArmsUnblinded ORI values, Blinded ORI values
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Hugo HilleMedecine Intensive Reanimation, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Aurélie Le ThuautResearch and Innovation Department, Methodology and Biostatistics Platform, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Pierre AsfarIntensive Care Unit, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Quentin QuelvenIntensive Care Unit, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Emmanuelle MercierIntensive Care Unit, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Anthony Le MeurIntensive Care Unit, Cholet Hospital, Cholet, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotIntensive Care Unit, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Virginie LemialeIntensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Grégoire MullerCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) d'Orléans, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Université de Tours, MR INSERM 1327 ISCHEMIA, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Martin CourMédecine Intensive-Réanimation, Edouard Herriot Hospital, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alexis FerréIntensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
Asael BergeIntensive Care Unit, Haguenau Hospital, Haguenau, France.
Anaïs CurtiaudDepartment of Intensive Care (Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Maxime TouronIntensive Care Unit, Cochin University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Gaetan PlantefeveIntensive Care Unit, Argenteuil Hospital, Argenteuil, France.
Jean-Charles ChakarianService de réanimation, Centre hospitalier de Roanne, CS 80511-42328 Roanne CEDEX, Roanne, France.
Jean-Damien RicardIntensive Care Unit, Louis-Mourier Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Colombes, France.
Gwenhael ColinIntensive Care Unit, Vendée District Hospital, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Arthur OrieuxIntensive Care Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick GirardieIntensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Mathieu JozwiakIntensive Care Unit, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.
Manon RouaudResearch and Innovation Department, Methodology and Biostatistics Platform, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Camille JuhelMedecine Intensive Reanimation, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Jean ReignierNantes Université, Nantes University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Motion-Interactions-Performance Laboratory (MIP), UR 4334, Nantes, France.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouNantes Université, Nantes University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Motion-Interactions-Performance Laboratory (MIP), UR 4334, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-078X
CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critically ill patients, endotracheal intubation (ETI) is lifesaving but carries a high risk of adverse events, notably hypoxemia. Preoxygenation is performed before introducing the tube to increase the safe apnea time. Oxygenation is monitored by pulse oximeter measurement of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). However, SpO2 is unreliable at the high oxygenation levels produced by preoxygenation and, in the event of desaturation, may not decrease sufficiently early to allow preventive measures. The oxygen reserve index (ORI) is a dimensionless parameter that can also be measured continuously by a fingertip monitor and reflects oxygenation in the moderate hyperoxia range. The ORI ranges from 0 to 1 when arterial oxygen saturation (PaO2) varies between 100 to 200 mmHg, as occurs during preoxygenation. No trial has assessed the potential effects of ORI monitoring to guide preoxygenation for ETI in unstable patients. We designed a multicenter, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, superiority, open trial in 950 critically ill adults requiring ETI. The intervention consists in monitoring ORI values and using an ORI target for preoxygenation of at least 0.6 for at least 1 minute. In the control group, preoxygenation is guided by SpO2 values recorded by a standard pulse oximeter, according to the standard of care, the goal being to obtain 100% SpO2 during preoxygenation, which lasts at least 3 minutes. The standard-of-care ETI technique is used in both arms. Baseline parameters, rapid-sequence induction medications, ETI devices, and physiological data are recorded. The primary outcome is the lowest SpO2 value from laryngoscopy to 2 minutes after successful ETI. Secondary outcomes include cognitive function on day 28. Assuming a 10% standard deviation for the lowest SpO2 value in the control group, no missing data, and crossover of 5% of patients, with the bilateral alpha risk set at 0.05, including 950 patients will provide 85% power for detecting a 2% between-group absolute difference in the lowest SpO2 value. Should ORI monitoring with a target of ≥0.6 be found to increase the lowest SpO2 value during ETI, then this trial may change current practice regarding preoxygenation for ETI. Trial registration: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05867875) on April 27, 2023.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealOximetryOxygenOxygen SaturationAdultCritical IllnessEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39283873
PMCPMC11404791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.