Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283719›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

'I Think the First Priority is Physically Safe First, Before You Can Actually Get Psychologically Safe': Staff Perspectives on Psychological Safety in Inpatient Mental Health Settings.

Katharina Sophie Vogt, John Baker, Matthew Morys-Edge, Sarah Kendal, Emily Mizen, Judith Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How can we measure psychological safety in mental healthcare staff? Developing questionnaire items using a nominal groups technique.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katharina Sophie VogtTemple Bank House, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-637X
John BakerSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Matthew Morys-EdgeTemple Bank House, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Sarah KendalSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Emily MizenNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Judith JohnsonTemple Bank House, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre PSTRC-2016-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile the concept of psychological safety has been gaining momentum, research concerning psychological safety in inpatient mental health wards is lacking.

aimTo investigate how psychological safety is conceptualised by healthcare staff in inpatient mental health units, and what barriers and facilitators exist.

methodReflexive Thematic Analysis was used to analyse 12 interviews.

resultsParticipants conceptualised psychological safety as feeling safe from physical harm, being able to develop meaningful relationships and feeling valued at work. Participants often did not feel physically safe at work, which led them to feel psychologically unsafe. Barriers to psychological safety were reliance on agency workers, punitive management approaches and the inherent risk in working with mental health inpatients. Facilitators included appropriate staffing ratios and skill mix, being able to form meaningful relationships and having access to support. DISCUSSION: The emphasis on the physical safety element within psychological safety means that existing definitions of psychological safety require extension for the mental healthcare context. However, large-scale research is needed to further understand experiences of psychological safety in this group. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A better understanding of the dimensions of psychological safety in inpatient mental health settings could support the development of tools to investigate psychological safety interventions. Organisations could support psychological safety through regular staff supervision and improved staffing ratios and skill mix.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHospitals, PsychiatricInpatientsPatient SafetyPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric NursingPsychological SafetyQualitative Researchqualitative methodologyquality of caresafety and securitystaffing/resourcesstaff perceptions

Identifiers

PMID39283719
PMCPMC11891413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.