ArticleJAMA internal medicine2024
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Cirrhosis and Related Complications in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) 2026.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Guideline
- Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Muscle Mass, Strength, and Quality in MASLD: A Systematic Review.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Pooled it
- The Gastrointestinal Safety of Orforglipron, a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, in Adults With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping GLP-1 receptor agonist research across the MASLD-MASH-HCC continuum: a bibliometric and translational analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- MASLD and sarcopenia research (2012-2025): a multi-database bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and advanced liver outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention: A Meta-Analysis and Clinical Decision Framework.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The correlation between novel antidiabetic agents utilization and hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in type 2 diabetes patients: a network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists in managing MALFD: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Associations Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Emerging Topics In Obesity Treatment in the Setting of Organ Transplantation.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss and Risk of Major Safety Outcomes: A Multicentre Cohort Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis-Informed Phenotype-Guided Therapy for MASH: A Three-Axis Translational Framework Within the MASLD Spectrum.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Before and After Liver Transplant.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- HFpEF and MASLD: converging mechanisms and clinical implications.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Secular Trend in Glycaemic Management in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With and Without Cirrhosis Between 2000 and 2023: A Territory-Wide Cohort Study.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Liver donor macrosteatosis is associated with adverse long-term outcomes exclusively in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease recipients: a U.S. transplant registry analysis over the last decade.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Mortality of Obesity Classes 4 and 5 in Adults.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of GLP-1 Therapy vs. Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an increasing cause of cirrhosis. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective in improving liver inflammation in patients with MASLD. Objective: To determine whether use of GLP-1 RAs is associated with lower risk of developing cirrhosis and its complications, including decompensation and hepatocellular cancer (HCC), among patients with MASLD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study with an active comparator, new-user design used data from the national Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse and Central Cancer Registry. Patients with MASLD and diabetes who were seen at 130 Veterans Health Administration hospitals and associated ambulatory clinics and who initiated either a GLP-1 RA or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2022, were included. Patients were followed up from baseline until one of the study outcomes or the end of the study period (December 31, 2022), whichever came first. Exposures: Each GLP-1 RA new user was propensity score matched in 1:1 ratio to a patient who initiated a DPP-4i during the same month. Separate analyses were conducted among patients without and with cirrhosis at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures: For patients without cirrhosis, the primary outcome was progression to cirrhosis defined by validated diagnoses codes or a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis, and secondary outcomes were cirrhosis complications defined both as a composite and individual complications, including decompensation, HCC, or liver transplant, and all-cause mortality. For patients with cirrhosis, the primary outcome was a composite outcome of cirrhosis complications, and secondary outcomes were decompensation, HCC, and all-cause mortality. Results: Of 16 058 patients who initiated GLP-1 RAs, 14 606 did not have cirrhosis (mean [SD] age, 60.56 [10.31] years; 13 015 [89.1%] male), and 1452 had cirrhosis (mean [SD] age, 66.99 [7.09] years; 1360 [93.7%] male) at baseline. These patients were matched to an equal number of patients who initiated a DPP-4i. In patients without cirrhosis, GLP-1 RA use, compared with DPP-4i use, was associated with a lower risk of cirrhosis (9.98 vs 11.10 events per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98). Similar results were seen for the secondary outcomes. GLP-1 RA use, compared with DPP-4i use, was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of cirrhosis complications (1.89 vs 2.55 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59-1.04) and mortality (21.77 vs 24.43 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98). There were no associations between GLP-1 RA use and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower risk of progression to cirrhosis and mortality among patients with MASLD and diabetes. The protective association was not seen in patients with existing cirrhosis, underscoring the importance of treatment earlier in the disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.