Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283593›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024

An analysis of FRE @ BC8 SympTEMIST track: named entity recognition.

Ander Martinez, Nuria García-Santa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An analysis of FRE @ BC8 SympTEMIST track: named entity recognition.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ander MartinezAI & Computing Research Group, Fujitsu Research of Europe Ltd, Camino del Cerro de los Gamos, 1, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid 28224, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2290-8194
Nuria García-SantaAI & Computing Research Group, Fujitsu Research of Europe Ltd, Camino del Cerro de los Gamos, 1, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid 28224, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3482-3297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is a more in-depth analysis of the approaches used in our submission (Martínez A, García-Santa N. (2023) FRE @ BC8 SympTEMIST track: Named Entity Recognition Zenodo.) to the 'SympTEMIST' Named Entity Recognition (NER) shared subtask at 'BioCreative 2023'. We participated on the challenge submitting two systems based on a RoBERTa architecture LLM trained on Spanish-language clinical data available at 'HuggingFace' model repository. Before choosing the systems that would be submitted, we tried different combinations of the techniques described here: Conditional Random Fields and Byte-Pair Encoding dropout. In the second system we also included Sub-Subword feature based embeddings (SSW). The test set used in the challenge has now been released (López SL, Sánchez LG, Farré E et al. (2024) SympTEMIST Corpus: Gold Standard annotations for clinical symptoms, signs and findings information extraction. Zenodo), allowing us to analyze more in depth our methods, as well as measuring the impact of introducing data from CARMEN-I (Lima-López S, Farré-Maduell E, Krallinger M. (2023) CARMEN-I: Clinical Entities Annotation Guidelines in Spanish. Zenodo) corpus. Our experiments show the moderate effect of using the Sub-Subword feature based embeddings and the impact of including the symptom NER data from the CARMEN-I dataset. Database URL: https://physionet.org/content/carmen-i/1.0/.

Indexed as

Data MiningDatabases, FactualHumans

Identifiers

PMID39283593
PMCPMC11403810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.