ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025
Cranial and spinal computed tomography (CT) angiography with photon-counting detector CT: comparison with angiographic and operative findings.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective concordance of multidetector CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in assessing bronchial artery morphology for hemoptysis embolization outcomes.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Appropriate dose reduction using photon-counting detector CT for temporal bone imaging: phantom and clinical studies with helical acquisition.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Photon-counting detector computed tomography in thoracic oncology: revolutionizing tumor imaging through precision and detail.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Review
- Noninvasive assessment of multistate intracranial and cervical aneurysms using PCCTA.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Photon-counting CT in neuroradiology: a comprehensive SWOT analysis.European radiology · 2026Review
- Neuroimaging with photon-counting computed tomography: A review of clinical applications.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical imaging features of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) are mainly known as dose reduction, improvement of spatial resolution, and reduction of artifacts compared to energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). The utility of cranial and spinal PCD-CT and PCD-CT angiography (CTA) has been previously reported. CTA is a widely used technique for noninvasive evaluation. Cranial CTA is important in brain tumors, especially glioblastoma; it evaluates whether the tumor is highly vascularized prior to an operation and helps in the diagnosis and assessment of bleeding risk. Spinal CTA has an important role in the estimation of feeders and drainers prior to selective angiography in the cases of spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas and spinal tumors, especially in hemangioblastoma. So far, EID-CTA is commonly performed in an adjunctive role prior to selective angiography; PCD-CTA with high spatial resolution can be an alternative to selective angiography. In the cases of cerebral aneurysms, flow diverters are important tools for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, and postoperative evaluation with cone beam CT with angiography using diluted contrast media is performed to evaluate stent adhesion and in-stent thrombosis. If CTA can replace selective angiography, it will be less invasive for the patient. In this review, we present representative cases with PCD-CT. We also show how well the cranial and spinal PCD-CTA approaches the accuracy of angiographic and intraoperative findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.