Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283532›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025

Cranial and spinal computed tomography (CT) angiography with photon-counting detector CT: comparison with angiographic and operative findings.

Fumiyo Higaki, Masafumi Hiramatsu, Takao Yasuhara, Susumu Sasada, Yoshihiro Otani, Jun Haruma, Tomohiro Inoue, Yusuke Morimitsu, Noriaki Akagi, Yusuke Matsui and 2 more

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fumiyo HigakiDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan. fumiyo.higaki@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-8546
Masafumi HiramatsuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Takao YasuharaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Susumu SasadaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshihiro OtaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Jun HarumaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Tomohiro InoueDivision of Radiological Technology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Yusuke MorimitsuDivision of Radiological Technology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Noriaki AkagiDivision of Radiological Technology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Toshihiro IguchiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Takao HirakiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical imaging features of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) are mainly known as dose reduction, improvement of spatial resolution, and reduction of artifacts compared to energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). The utility of cranial and spinal PCD-CT and PCD-CT angiography (CTA) has been previously reported. CTA is a widely used technique for noninvasive evaluation. Cranial CTA is important in brain tumors, especially glioblastoma; it evaluates whether the tumor is highly vascularized prior to an operation and helps in the diagnosis and assessment of bleeding risk. Spinal CTA has an important role in the estimation of feeders and drainers prior to selective angiography in the cases of spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas and spinal tumors, especially in hemangioblastoma. So far, EID-CTA is commonly performed in an adjunctive role prior to selective angiography; PCD-CTA with high spatial resolution can be an alternative to selective angiography. In the cases of cerebral aneurysms, flow diverters are important tools for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, and postoperative evaluation with cone beam CT with angiography using diluted contrast media is performed to evaluate stent adhesion and in-stent thrombosis. If CTA can replace selective angiography, it will be less invasive for the patient. In this review, we present representative cases with PCD-CT. We also show how well the cranial and spinal PCD-CTA approaches the accuracy of angiographic and intraoperative findings.

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyBrainHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotonsSpineCT angiographyEnergy-integrating detector CTNeuroimagingPhoton-counting detector CTSpine

Identifiers

PMID39283532
PMCPMC11790754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.