ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024
Biotechnological approaches for suppressing Microcystis blooms: insights and challenges.
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative assessment of phytoremediation using Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Ipomoea aquatica floating beds for phytoplankton community restoration and microcystin-LR removal in eutrophic pond water.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms, particularly those dominated by Microcystis, pose significant ecological and health risks worldwide. This review provides an overview of the latest advances in biotechnological approaches for mitigating Microcystis blooms, focusing on cyanobactericidal bacteria, fungi, eukaryotic microalgae, zooplankton, aquatic plants, and cyanophages. Recently, promising results have been obtained using cyanobactericidal bacteria: not through the inoculation of cultured bacteria, but rather by nurturing those already present in the periphyton or biofilms of aquatic plants. Fungi and eukaryotic microalgae also exhibit algicidal properties; however, their practical applications still face challenges. Zooplankton grazing on Microcystis can improve water quality, but hurdles exist because of the colonial form and toxin production of Microcystis. Aquatic plants control blooms through allelopathy and nutrient absorption. Although cyanophages hold promise for Microcystis control, their strain-specificity hinders widespread use. Despite successful laboratory validation, field applications of biological methods are limited. Future research should leverage advanced molecular and bioinformatic techniques to understand microbial interactions during blooms and offer insights into innovative control strategies. Despite progress, the efficacy of biological methods under field conditions requires further verification, emphasizing the importance of integrating advanced multi-meta-omics techniques with practical applications to address the challenges posed by Microcystis blooms. KEY POINTS: • A diverse range of biotechnological methods is presented for suppressing Microcystis blooms. • Efficacy in laboratory experiments needs to be proved further in field applications. • Multi-meta-omics techniques offer novel insights into Microcystis dynamics and interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.