ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Understanding pelvic mobility is important to correctly diagnose and treat painful hips with positive impingement test in non-arthritic patients.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative sacral slope change (ΔSS) as a risk factor for mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo determine repeatability of pelvic mobility, calculated as both change in sacral slope (∆SS) and pelvic tilt (∆PT), and evaluate their correlations with pelvic incidence (PI) in non-arthritic patients with hip pain and positive impingement test.
methodsThe cohort comprised 82 patients aged 31.8 ± 7.4, with hip pain and positive impingement test. Stereo-radiographic images were acquired in three positions (neutral standing, neutral sitting, and flexed-forward-sitting). PI, pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured. Repeatability was evaluated. Pelvic mobility was calculated as ΔPT and ΔSS from (i) standing to sitting, (ii) neutral to flexed-forward-sitting, and (iii) maximum to minimum values. Correlations of PI with PT, SS, ΔPT, and ΔSS were assessed.
resultsRepeatability was excellent for all pelvic mobility measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC > 0.97). ΔPT was 25.9 ± 8.3º from standing to sitting, 14.4 ± 11.2º from standing to flexed-forward-sitting, and 37.8 ± 13.7º from maximum to minimum values. ΔSS was 24.0 ± 7.6º from standing to sitting, 14.2 ± 11.6º from standing to flexed-forward-sitting, and 35.9 ± 13.7º from maximum to minimum values. PI was strongly correlated with PT in standing (r = 0.7) and SS in standing (r = 0.7), and moderately correlated with PT in sitting (r = 0.6) and SS in sitting (r = 0.5), but was not correlated with neither ΔPT nor ΔSS (r < 0.3).
conclusionPelvic mobility, calculated as ΔPT and ΔSS, has excellent repeatability, and is not correlated with PI in non-arthritic patients with hip pain. Therefore, PI is of limited value for diagnosis and treatment of painful hips with positive impingement test, as well as to distinguish hip users from spine users; pelvic mobility should be used instead. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39283497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.