SynthesisMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2024
A systematic investigation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using meta-analysis and systems biology approaches.
Synthesis in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma with clear cells (ccRCC) is the most frequent kind; it accounts for almost 70% of all kidney cancers. A primary objective of current research was to find genes that may be used in ccRCC gene therapy to understand better the molecular pathways underlying the disease. Based on PubMed microarray searches and meta-analyses, we compared overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates in ccRCC patients with those in healthy samples. The technique was followed by a KEGG pathway and Gene Ontology (GO) function analyses, both performed in conjunction with the approach. Tumor immune estimate and multi-gene biomarkers validation for clinical outcomes were performed at the molecular and clinical cohort levels. Our analysis included fourteen GEO datasets based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A meta-analysis procedure, network construction using PPIs, and four significant gene identification standard algorithms indicated that 11 genes had the most important differences. Ten genes were upregulated, and one was downregulated in the study. In order to analyze RFS and OS survival rates, 11 genes expressed in the GEPIA2 database were examined. Nearly nine of eleven significant genes have been found to beinvolved in tumor immunity. Furthermore, it was found that mRNA expression levels of these genes were significantly correlated with experimental literature studies on ccRCCs, which explained these findings. This study identified eleven gene panels associated with ccRCC growth and metastasis, as well as their immune system infiltration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39283494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.