Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283426›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Vaccination and Therapeutics.

Walid Shaban Abdella, Ahmed Nabil Selim, Sheeren Diab, Esraa Qobeia, Akram Fekry Elgazzar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Walid Shaban AbdellaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Dimette, Egypt. Walid.Abdelaa.1997@gmail.com.
Ahmed Nabil SelimFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Sheeren DiabFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Esraa QobeiaFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University for Girls, Cairo, Egypt.
Akram Fekry ElgazzarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Dimette, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of the novel Coronavirus, it has become imperative to develop vaccines that can alert our immune system to the virus, hence reducing the severity of disease if exposed to it. Different types of vaccines have been studied in this respect, such as nucleic acid vaccines (mRNA and DNA vaccines), vector-based vaccines, whole-virus vaccines (inactivated virus and live-attenuated vaccine), as well as protein subunits vaccines. The results have demonstrated that these vaccines are efficient against both the original strain and emerging variants. Furthermore, they also proved their safety with no grave adverse events. Despite this, hesitancy toward taking these vaccines is still present among certain groups in society due to various factors. Special emphasis has been placed on studies concerning pregnant women, children, elderly people, and immunocompromised individuals where efficacy and safety were proven.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostmRNA VaccinesPregnancyCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesAd26.COV2.SAdenovirusCoronavirusCOVID-19DNAEpiVacCoronaGlycoproteinmRNANovavaxNVX-CoV2373Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39283426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.