Observational studyHead and neck pathology2024
Giant Cell Lesions of the Jaws: A Work on Current Concepts and Making Through a Working Classification.
Observational study in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aneurysmal bone cyst associated with a dentigerous cyst in the mandible: A diagnostic challenge-case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Histopathological and radiographic characteristics of central giant cell granulomas: a retrospective study of 45 cases.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant cell-rich lesions are a diverse group of lesions that usually occur in bone and contain varying numbers of reactive osteoclastic-type multinucleate giant cells. These lesions present a challenge in pathologic diagnosis, often requiring a combination of clinical, radiographic, and histopathological assessments. The present retrospective observational study aims to provide a concise diagnostic criterion by combining all these parameters, which will aid in effective diagnosis and targeted treatment planning in the future. MATERIAL AND
methodPreviously diagnosed cases of these lesions were taken from the archives and categorized as Central Giant Cell Granuloma (CGCG), CGCG with secondary Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC), primary ABC, and Brown's Tumour. Their demographic characteristics along with clinical, radiological, and histological data were retrieved and compiled into the table. The data was then analyzed and classified into aggressive and non-aggressive CGCG according to the criteria set in the study.
result10 reported cases were of isolated CGCG, 5 were CGCG with secondary ABC, 5 of Brown's tumor and 3 were that of conventional ABC. Out of these, the lesions showing extensive size along with an increased number of giant cells were categorized under aggressive CGCG, whereas those with less aggressive characteristics were categorized under non-aggressive CGCG. The aggressive category comprised 5 cases of isolated CGCG, 2 cases of CGCG with secondary ABC, 3 cases of primary ABC, and 5 of brown tumor, whilst the rest of the cases were categorized under non-aggressive CGCG.
conclusionSince all these share overlapping features, thereby this type of concise categorization is the dire need so that the lesions can have a precise diagnosis with treatment and follow-up intervals for aggressive lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.