ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
An automated framework for pediatric hip surveillance and severity assessment using radiographs.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automated Analysis of Pelvic Radiographs for Hip Dysplasia Screening Using Artificial Intelligence in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Analyzing pediatric forearm X-rays for fracture analysis using machine learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHip dysplasia is the second most common orthopedic condition in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and may result in disability and pain. The migration percentage (MP) is a widely used metric in hip surveillance, calculated based on an anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph. However, manual quantification of MP values using hip X-ray scans in current standard practice has challenges including being time-intensive, requiring expert knowledge, and not considering human bias. The purpose of this study is to develop a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify MP values using a hip X-ray scan, and hence provide an assessment for severity, which then can be used for surveillance, treatment planning, and management.
methodsX-ray scans from 210 patients were curated, pre-processed, and manually annotated at our clinical center. Several machine learning models were trained using pre-trained weights from Inception ResNet-V2, VGG-16, and VGG-19, with different strategies (pre-processing, with and without region of interest (ROI) detection, with and without data augmentation) to find an optimal model for automatic hip landmarking. The predicted landmarks were then used by our geometric algorithm to quantify the MP value for the input hip X-ray scan.
resultsThe pre-trained VGG-19 model, fine-tuned with additional custom layers, outputted the lowest mean squared error values for both train and test data, when ROI cropped images were used along with data augmentation for model training. The MP value calculated by the algorithm was compared to manual ground truth labels from our orthopedic fellows using the hip screen application for benchmarking.
conclusionThe results showed the feasibility of the machine learning model in automatic hip landmark detection for reliably quantifying MP value from hip X-ray scans. The algorithm could be used as an accurate and reliable tool in orthopedic care for diagnosing, severity assessment, and hence treatment and surgical planning for hip displacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39283409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.