ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Use machine learning to predict pulmonary metastasis of esophageal cancer: a population-based study.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning to predict distant metastasis risk and prognostic analysis in T1-2 esophageal cancer: a study based on the SEER database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for esophageal cancer liver metastases using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Survival Prediction in Brain Metastasis Patients Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to establish a predictive model for assessing the risk of esophageal cancer lung metastasis using machine learning techniques.
methodsData on esophageal cancer patients from 2010 to 2020 were extracted from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, eight indicators related to the risk of lung metastasis were selected. These indicators were incorporated into six machine learning classifiers to develop corresponding predictive models. The performance of these models was evaluated and compared using metrics such as The area under curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score.
resultsA total of 20,249 confirmed cases of esophageal cancer were included in this study. Among them, 14,174 cases (70%) were assigned to the training set while 6075 cases (30%) constituted the internal test set. Primary site location, tumor histology, tumor grade classification system T staging criteria N staging criteria brain metastasis bone metastasis liver metastasis emerged as independent risk factors for esophageal cancer with lung metastasis. Amongst the six constructed models, the GBM algorithm-based machine learning model demonstrated superior performance during internal dataset validation. AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values achieved by this model stood at respectively at 0.803, 0.849, 0.604, and 0.867.
conclusionWe have developed an online calculator based on the GBM model ( https://lvgrkyxcgdvo7ugoyxyywe.streamlit.app/)to aid clinical decision-making and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.