ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2024
The longitudinality of care from the perspective of Family Health users.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective Association Between Brazilian Primary Oral Health Care Models and Preventive Dental Visits and Risk Behaviours: A 5-Year Cohort Study Among Young Adults.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Continuity of care: trust-based relationship and availability of personalized information in user experience.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze longitudinality in the production of care in Family Health from the perspective of users.
methodQualitative research carried out with 18 users of a family health unit in a municipality in the state of São Paulo. The data was produced through semi-structured interviews and the empirical material was analyzed by interpreting the meanings in the light of the theoretical framework of continuity of care and longitudinality.
results22 ideas were identified and grouped into three meanings: organization and operationalization of work in the family health unit, self-care and the health system. The first highlighted elements of organizational constraints, workforce, hard and soft technologies. The second direction pointed to the user's co-responsibility for their health condition and lifestyle, making it possible to recognize longitudinality as: discontinuous or focused and continuous or extended. And in the third meaning, the understanding of the functioning of the three levels of care was presented with structural and technological demarcations.
conclusionThe users recognized potential and weaknesses in the three meanings referring to the constituent elements of the theoretical framework. Family Health is capable of offering continuous or extended longitudinality, even in a municipality with low coverage of the strategy. However, this scenario can weaken the process of developing the attribute from this perspective, as it limits access to other levels of care and compromises its structuring elements and dimensions and, consequently, the continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.