Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282967›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Repurposing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy grading.

Roser Velasco, Andreas A Argyriou, David R Cornblath, Pere Bruna, Paola Alberti, Emanuela Rossi, Ingemar S J Merkies, Dimitri Psimaras, Chiara Briani, Roy I Lalisang and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roser VelascoUnit of Neuro-Oncology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-Institut Català Oncologia, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3194-9406
Andreas A ArgyriouNeurological Department, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-7114
David R CornblathDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pere BrunaDepartment of Physics, Barcelona Research Center in Multiscale Science and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), BarcelonaTech, Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7411-1278
Paola AlbertiDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Technologies, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6106-6183
Emanuela RossiCenter of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Prevention, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Ingemar S J MerkiesDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Limburg, the Netherlands.
Dimitri PsimarasInstitute of Neurology, Unité INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR 7225 (Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière) and OncoNeuroTox Group, Center for Patients With Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Chiara BrianiDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-0200
Roy I LalisangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Angelo SchenoneDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal and Infantile Sciences, University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Guido CavalettiDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Technologies, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Jordi BrunaUnit of Neuro-Oncology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-Institut Català Oncologia, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6895-5047
CI‐PeriNomS Group

Funding

Beca Balil-Pelegrí del Grupo GEICAM de Investigación en Cáncer de MamaInstituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00283Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI21/00181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is perceived differently by patients and physicians, complicating its assessment. Current recommendations advocate combining clinical and patient-reported outcomes measures, but this approach can be challenging in patient care. This multicenter European study aims to bridge the gap between patients' perceptions and neurological impairments by aligning both perspectives to improve treatment decision-making.

methodsData were pooled from two prospective studies of subjects (n = 372) with established CIPN. Patient and physician views regarding CIPN were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Total Neuropathy Scale-clinical version (TNSc) items, and the disease-specific quality of life - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). To identify inherent neurotoxic severity patterns, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis optimized with k-means clustering and internally validated by discriminant functional analysis.

resultsBoth NCI-CTCAE and TNSc demonstrated a significant difference in the distribution of severity grades in relation to QLQ-CIPN20 scores. However, a proportion of subjects with different neurotoxic severity grades exhibited overlapping QLQ-CIPN20 scores. We identified three distinct clusters classifying subjects as having severely impaired, intermediately impaired, and mildly impaired CIPN based on TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20 scores. No differences in demographics, cancer type distribution, or class of drug received were observed.

conclusionsOur results confirm the heterogeneity in CIPN perception between patients and physicians and identify three well-differentiated subgroups of patients delineated by degree of CIPN impairment based on scores derived from TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20. A more refined assessment of CIPN could potentially be achieved using the calculator tool derived from the cluster equations in this study. This tool, which facilitates individual patient classification, requires prospective validation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexAntineoplastic Agentschemotherapychemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathyneurotoxicitypatient‐reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID39282967
PMCPMC11554987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.