ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2024
Identifying mitigating strategies for endothelial cell dysfunction and hypertension in response to VEGF receptor inhibitors.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heartbreakers and healers: RNA rebels in cardio-oncology.Seminars in cancer biology · 2026Review
- Pathological mechanisms and clinical research progress of endothelial dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- MicroRNA-Mediated Regulation of Vascular Endothelium: From Pro-Inflammation to Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Endothelial Cells Contributes to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor-Induced Vascular and Kidney Damage.American journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Ebbs and tides of endothelial KAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Article
- Effect of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor Toceranib on Cardiac Function and Endothelial Dysfunction Biomarkers in Dogs With Cancer.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRis) improve cancer survival but are associated with treatment-limiting hypertension, often attributed to endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction. Using phosphoproteomic profiling of VEGFRi-treated ECs, drugs were screened for mitigators of VEGFRi-induced EC dysfunction and validated in primary aortic ECs, mice, and canine cancer patients. VEGFRi treatment significantly raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increased markers of endothelial and renal dysfunction in mice and canine cancer patients. α-Adrenergic-antagonists were identified as drugs that most oppose the VEGFRi proteomic signature. Doxazosin, one such α-antagonist, prevented EC dysfunction in murine, canine, and human aortic ECs. In mice with sorafenib-induced-hypertension, doxazosin mitigated EC dysfunction but not hypertension or glomerular endotheliosis, while lisinopril mitigated hypertension and glomerular endotheliosis without impacting EC function. Hence, reversing EC dysfunction was insufficient to mitigate VEGFRi-induced-hypertension in this mouse model. Canine cancer patients with VEGFRi-induced-hypertension were randomized to doxazosin or lisinopril and both agents significantly decreased SBP. The canine clinical trial supports safety and efficacy of doxazosin and lisinopril as antihypertensives for VEGFRi-induced-hypertension and the potential of trials in canines with spontaneous cancer to accelerate translation. The overall findings demonstrate the utility of phosphoproteomics to identify EC-protective agents to mitigate cardio-oncology side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.