Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282663›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024

Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naïve Advanced

Caicun Zhou, You Lu, Sang-We Kim, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana, Jianying Zhou, Yiping Zhang, Jianxing He, Jin-Ji Yang, Ying Cheng, Se-Hoon Lee and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02838420 (Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naive Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02838420 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naive Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2016 to 2026Enrolled187ConditionsAnaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive Non-small Cell Lung CancerArmsAlectinib, Crizotinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adjuvant alectinib versus crizotinib in completely resectedTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Long-term outcomes of ALK inhibitors in metastaticTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Oncogenic Fusions in NSCLC: From Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Caicun ZhouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
You LuDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Sang-We KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Thanyanan ReungwetwattanaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jianying ZhouDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yiping ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianxing HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Ji YangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ying ChengDepartment of Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Se-Hoon LeeSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jianhua ChangCancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Jian FangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhe LiuDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lilian BuDepartment of Data Science, Roche (China) Holding Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li QianDepartment of Clinical Science, Roche (China) Holding Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tingting XuDepartment of Clinical Science, Roche (China) Holding Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Venice ArcherProduct Development, Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Magalie HiltonProduct Development Data Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Mingzhu ZhouDepartment of Safety, Roche (China) Holding Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced Methods: Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced Results: At the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced

Indexed as

AlectinibALESIAALKCrizotinibNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID39282663
PMCPMC11399573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.