Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282633›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

An Opt-Out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis.

Kimberly A Stanford, Joseph Mason, Eleanor Friedman, Aniruddha Hazra, Erin Augustine, John Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emergency Department Syphilis Screening: Insights from a National Stakeholder Convening.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  13. Syphilis Screening and Treatment at a Large Urban Jail.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kimberly A StanfordSection of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-1323
Joseph MasonSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Eleanor FriedmanSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Aniruddha HazraSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Erin AugustineSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John SchneiderSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Implementation of emergency department screening to impact rising syphilis rates in vulnerable populationsK23AI166277 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI STANFORD, KIMBERLY · 2022 to 2025
$820k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI166277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With rising rates of syphilis in the United States, novel strategies are needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly among priority populations such as pregnant people. As the primary source of healthcare for many communities with limited access to care, the emergency department (ED) visit represents a crucial opportunity for syphilis detection and congenital syphilis prevention. Methods: This pre-post design study examined all ED encounters for 2-year periods before and after implementation of an opt-out ED syphilis screening intervention in May 2019 at a large, urban, academic ED. Data on laboratory testing, syphilis status, and demographics were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine trends in syphilis screening and diagnosis. Results: Syphilis screening increased from 5209 (3.6%) to 37 289 (24.4%) encounters. Presumed active syphilis infection (PAI) increased 288%, from 161 patients (3.1% of those screened) to 624 (1.7%). The proportion of female PAI increased from 25.6% to 42.5%, despite no change in proportion of females screened. Post-intervention, 23.6% of PAI were tested for a urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the ED and 9.0% presented with symptoms of an STI by diagnosis code. Among pregnant people, screening increased from 5.9% to 49.9% of encounters, and syphilis diagnosis increased 750%, from 2 cases to 15. Conclusions: Opt-out ED syphilis screening led to a dramatic increase in screening and diagnosis, especially among pregnant individuals, a priority population for congenital syphilis prevention. Most individuals with syphilis did not have STI symptoms. Opt-out screening will be an important strategy in the effort to address the syphilis epidemic.

Indexed as

congenital syphilisemergency departmentpregnancyscreeningsyphilis

Identifiers

PMID39282633
PMCPMC11393470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.