Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282614›Full record

ArticleCurrent addiction reports2023

A systematic review of sex/gender differences in the multi-dimensional neurobiological mechanisms in addiction and their relevance to impulsivity.

Andrea M Maxwell, Leyla R Brucar, Anna Zilverstand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current addiction reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea M MaxwellMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4080-8835
Leyla R BrucarGraduate Program in Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5852-3088
Anna ZilverstandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-9700

Funding

Predoctoral Training of NeuroscientistsT32NS105604 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
Personalized relapse prediction in Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA029406 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Anna Zilverstand · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA029406NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Addiction may be characterized along three functional domains: Approach Behavior, Executive Function, and Negative Emotionality. Constructs underlying impulsivity thought to be relevant in addiction map on to these three functional domains. The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the extant research regarding sex/gender differences in the multi-dimensional domains of addiction using human neuroimaging and discuss their relevance to impulsivity. Recent Findings: Few papers over the past two decades have used human neuroimaging to test sex/gender differences in addiction. There is therefore a significant gap in the literature regarding sex/gender differences in the neurobiological mechanisms driving the multi-dimensionality of addiction and their implications to impulsivity. Summary: Of the 34 reviewed papers, the orbitofrontal cortex/ventromedial prefrontal cortex (OFC/vmPFC) was the most frequently reported brain region to evidence a sex/gender difference during fMRI tasks probing Approach Behavior and Negative Emotionality. This finding suggests potential sex/gender-specific patterns of subjective valuation in substance misuse, driven by OFC/vmPFC dysregulation.

Indexed as

AddictionfMRIfunctional neuroimaginggender differencessex differencessubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39282614
PMCPMC11395779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.