Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282595›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied polymer science2024

Experimental Investigation of Regenerated Cellulose Microdialysis Probe Sterilization.

Swayamdipta Bhaduri, Tse-Ang Lee, Jessie Peng, Maarig Qureshi, Rueben Gonzales, Tanya Hutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied polymer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Swayamdipta BhaduriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UT Austin.
Tse-Ang LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UT Austin.
Jessie PengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UT Austin.
Maarig QureshiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UT Austin.
Rueben GonzalesDivision of Phrmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, UT Austin.
Tanya HutterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UT Austin.

Funding

Optical probe for continuous real-time in vivo study of brain alcoholR21AA029770 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HUTTER, TANYA · 2022 to 2023
$380k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA029770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sterilization of devices is important in hospitals, operating theatres, and emergency rooms. Microdialysis allows in vivo sampling of small molecules and is used for clinical studies. Microdialysis probes are made of soft, flexible, porous polymeric membranes. They have been traditionally disinfected using either ethanol (which fails to eliminate all microbes and doesn't satisfy regulatory requirements) or ethylene oxide gas and gamma irradiation (that are expensive and resource-intensive). In this work, three methods for microdialysis probe-sterilization were studied - autoclave and two chemicals (commercially available sterilization solutions): Sporox II and MetriCide. Following sterilization, the regenerated cellulose membranes were characterized under scanning electron microscopy and by measuring the changes in pore characteristics using nitrogen sorption. To determine the effect of sterilization on analyte diffusion through the membrane, microdialysis probes were fabricated, sterilized and tested with two analytes; ethanol and dopamine. The autoclaved membranes suffered thermo-mechanical damage and were deemed unfit for further testing. Probes sterilized with the chemical solutions were subsequently characterized by in vitro microdialysis experiments performed under regulated mass flux conditions. It is concluded that autoclaving is not a suitable sterilization technique for the cellulose membranes, while both of the chemical sterilizers were found to be good candidates for sterilization.

Identifiers

PMID39282595
PMCPMC11395294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.