Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282491›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Rare Cause of Cauda Equina Syndrome: Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung.

Palmer H Ford, Eric Carbo, Andrew Rennie, Richard Virgilio

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Palmer H FordDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brookwood Baptist Health, Birmingham, USA.
Eric CarboDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brookwood Baptist Health, Birmingham, USA.
Andrew RennieDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brookwood Baptist Health, Birmingham, USA.
Richard VirgilioDepartment of Clinical Affairs, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition describing the constellation of symptoms resulting from the compression of the cauda equina. Metastatic lesions are a common cause of CES, with lung lesions often implicated as the primary source. A particularly rare cause of CES is leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from primary solid tumors. In this case, a 63-year-old male presented with urinary and fecal retention, as well as altered sensation in the genitalia. The clinical diagnosis of CES was based on the constellation of symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) imaging demonstrated a metastatic lesion in the S2 and S3 sacral vertebral bodies, with extension into the right piriformis muscle. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an intramedullary lesion at L2 and leptomeningeal enhancement, indicative of metastasis. Further imaging identified a primary lesion in the right lower lobe of the lung, with additional metastases to the brain and liver. A pathological diagnosis of metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) was confirmed following a supraclavicular lymph node biopsy. The patient received steroid therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation to the pelvis. This case provides an important perspective on CES evaluation due to the scarcity of literature highlighting spinal metastases as the primary presentation in patients with NEC of the lung. The clinical diagnosis of CES should raise suspicion for metastasis and warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

cauda equina syndrome (ces)chemotherapyintramedullary spinal cord metastasislarge cell neuroendocrineleptomeningeal carcinomalung cancerneuroendocrine carcinoma (nec)pulmonologysmall cell lung cancer (sclc)stage iv cancer

Identifiers

PMID39282491
PMCPMC11398847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.