ArticleCureus2024
Quantifying Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Multifocal Refractory Epilepsy: A Model Across Multiple Surgeries.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of vagus nerve stimulation on the most disabling seizures: A retrospective study in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the outcomes of vagal nerve stimulation in children with drug-refractory epilepsy in South Africa.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to develop a quantifiable model for evaluating the outcomes of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with multifocal refractory epilepsy, particularly focusing on those who have undergone multiple surgeries. By adopting a patient-centered approach, the study seeks to provide a robust framework for assessing VNS efficacy across various patient demographics, including both adult and pediatric patients, and those with impaired cognitive and communicative abilities. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 patients with multifocal refractory epilepsy who underwent at least one VNS surgery. The cohort was divided into two groups: adults (≥16 years) and a combined pediatric group that included patients under 16 years of age and patients with impaired cognitive and communicative skills. The Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (LSSS) was used for adults, while the Hague Seizure Severity Scale (HASS) was employed for the pediatric group. Key outcome measures, including changes in seizure frequency, quality of life (QoL), number of hospitalizations, and other clinical metrics, were quantified using our proposed model. The iterative use of the mentioned scales was also assessed for validity by comparison with the Engel Outcome Scale (EOS). A total of 96 procedures were assessed. Results The results indicated a significant reduction in seizure severity post-surgery across both groups, as quantified by the LSSS for adults and HASS for pediatric and cognitively impaired patients. The model also demonstrated a consistent decrease in seizure frequency and an improvement in QoL metrics over successive surgeries. Minimal major side effects were reported, supporting the effectiveness of our quantification approach in capturing VNS outcomes. Conclusions This study introduces a novel, quantifiable model for evaluating VNS outcomes, providing a comprehensive tool for clinicians to assess the effectiveness of VNS in managing multifocal refractory epilepsy. By integrating multiple outcome measures into a cohesive framework, our model can aid in better understanding VNS therapy's impact and contribute to more informed clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.