Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282322›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

The interaction between abiotic and biotic soil factors drive heterosis expression in maize.

Kayla M Clouse, Martel L Ellis, Natalie E Ford, Rachel Hostetler, Peter J Balint-Kurti, Manuel Kleiner, Maggie R Wagner

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kayla M ClouseDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045.
Martel L EllisDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045.
Natalie E FordDepartment of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Rachel HostetlerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045.
Peter J Balint-KurtiDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.ORCID 0000-0002-3916-194X
Manuel KleinerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Maggie R WagnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045.ORCID 0000-0002-6924-7226

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
Using PCORnet to Expand the DS-CONNECT Cohort Through Healthcare System Recruitment, Incorporating Electronic Health Records, and Assessing Self-DeterminationU54HD090216 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2016 to 2020
$6.2M
Molecular Regulation of Cell Development and Differentiation Phase III COBREP30GM122731 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABRAHAMSON, DALE R · 2017 to 2021
$5.6M
High Throughput Sequencing System for KUMC Genomics CoreS10OD021743 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, PETER G · 2017 to 2017
$493k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090216NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122731NIH HHS S10 OD021743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis or hybrid vigor refers to the superior phenotypes of hybrids relative to their parental inbred lines. Recently, soil microbes were identified as an environmental driver of maize heterosis. While manipulation of the soil microbial community consistently altered heterosis, the direction of the effect appeared to be dependent on the microbiome composition, environment, or both. Abiotic factors are well-known modifiers of heterosis expression, however, how the interactive effects between the soil microbial community and abiotic factors contribute to heterosis are poorly understood. To disentangle the proposed mechanisms by which microbes influence heterosis, we characterize the variation in heterosis expression when maize was grown in soil inocula derived from active maize farms or prairies. While we did not observe consistent differences in heterosis among plants grown in these inocula, our observations reaffirm that microbial effects on heterosis are likely specific to the local microbial community. The introduction of a nutrient amendment resulted in greater heterosis expression in the presence of an agricultural inoculum but not a prairie inoculum. We also observed an effect of soil inocula and nutrient treatment on the composition of bacterial and fungal communities in the root endosphere. In addition, the interaction between soil and nutrient treatment significantly affected bacterial community composition, whereas fungal community composition was only marginally affected by this interaction. These results further suggest that the soil microbial community plays a role in maize heterosis expression but that the abiotic environment is likely a larger driver.

Identifiers

PMID39282322
PMCPMC11398361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.