Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282318›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Antibiotic killing of drug-induced bacteriostatic cells.

Teresa Gil-Gil, Brandon A Berryhill

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa Gil-GilDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-3965
Brandon A BerryhillDepartment of Biology, Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3430-0901

Funding

Single Cell Analysis Core (Core C)U19AI158080 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2021 to 2025
$10.9M
Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Population and Evolutionary Dynamics of Bacteria and Bacteriophage.R35GM136407 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI158080NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synopsis: Background: There is a long-standing belief that bacteriostatic drugs are inherently antagonistic to the action of bactericidal antibiotics. This belief is primarily due to the fact that the action of most bactericidal antibiotics requires the target bacteria to be growing. Since bacteriostatic drugs stop the growth of treated bacteria, these drugs would necessarily work against one another. We have recently shown that bacteria treated with high concentrations of bacteriostatic drugs retain some metabolic activity, dividing on average once per day. Objectives: We seek to determine if this low level of growth is sufficient to allow for bactericidal antibiotics of different classes to still kill after bacteria are treated with bacteriostatic drugs. Methods: We first treated Results: Our results question this long-standing belief by demonstrating conditions where sequential treatment with a bacteriostatic then bactericidal antibiotic is as or more effective than treatment with a bactericidal drug alone. Conclusions: These results raise the need to investigate the pharmacodynamics of the joint action of bacteriostatic and bactericidal antibiotics

Indexed as

Antibiotic ResistanceAntibioticsBacteriostasisPopulation Biology

Identifiers

PMID39282318
PMCPMC11398456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.