ArticleBio-protocol2024
An Imaging-Based Assay to Measure the Location of PD-1 at the Immune Synapse for Testing the Binding Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PD-1 is an immune checkpoint on T cells. Antibodies to PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 are gaining popularity as a leading immunotherapy approach. In the US, 40% of all cancer patients will be treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies but, unfortunately, only 30% will respond, and many will develop immune-related adverse events. There are nine FDA-approved anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and approximately 100 are in different stages of clinical development. It is a clinical challenge to choose the correct antibody for a given patient, and this is critical in advanced malignancies, which often do not permit a second-line intervention. To resolve that, an in vitro assay to compare the performance of the different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies is not only a critical tool for research purposes but also a possible tool for personalized medicine. There are some assays describing the binding affinity and function of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. However, a significant limitation of existing assays is that they need to consider the location of PD-1 in the immune synapse, the interface between the T cell and tumor cells, and, therefore, ignore a critical component in its biology. To address this, we developed and validated an imaging-based assay to quantify and compare the ability of different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies to remove PD-1 from the immune synapse. We correlated that with the same antibodies' ability to increase cytokine secretion from the targeted cells. The strong correlation between PD-1 location and its function in vitro and in vivo within the antibody treatment setting validates this assay's usability, which is easily recordable and straightforward. Key features • Live-cell imaging quantifies and compares how anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies disrupt PD-1 localization, causing the removal of PD-1 during immune synapse formation. • Hao et al. [1] validated the protocol, and the findings were extended to a live confocal microscopy method. • It requires a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope and appropriate imaging software and is optimized for the latest version of Zen Blue. • Anti-PD-1 antibodies are commonly used in cancer therapies, and this protocol optimizes the analysis of their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.