ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
A method for detecting ureteral stent encrustations in medical CT images based on Mask-RCNN and 3D morphological analysis.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of external drainage ureteral tube versus double-J catheter placement on subjective comfort and adverse events after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Toward Supportive Decision-Making for Ureteral Stent Removal: Development of a Morphology-Based X-Ray Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a method for detecting ureteral stent encrustations in medical CT images based on Mask-RCNN and 3D morphological analysis. Method: All 222 cases of ureteral stent data were obtained from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Firstly, a neural network was used to detect the region of the ureteral stent, and the results of the coarse detection were completed and connected domain filtered based on the continuity of the ureteral stent in 3D space to obtain a 3D segmentation result. Secondly, the segmentation results were analyzed and detected based on the 3D morphology, and the centerline was obtained through thinning the 3D image, fitting and deriving the ureteral stent, and obtaining radial sections. Finally, the abnormal areas of the radial section were detected through polar coordinate transformation to detect the encrustation area of the ureteral stent. Results: For the detection of ureteral stent encrustations in the ureter, the algorithm's confusion matrix achieved an accuracy of 79.6% in the validation of residual stones/ureteral stent encrustations at 186 locations. Ultimately, the algorithm was validated in 222 cases, achieving a ureteral stent segmentation accuracy of 94.4% and a positive and negative judgment accuracy of 87.3%. The average detection time per case was 12 s. Conclusion: The proposed medical CT image ureteral stent wall stone detection method based on Mask-RCNN and 3D morphological analysis can effectively assist clinical doctors in diagnosing ureteral stent encrustations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.