ArticleJAMIA open2024
In-hospital mortality, readmission, and prolonged length of stay risk prediction leveraging historical electronic patient records.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Development and validation of dual-time-window readmission prediction models under China's medical insurance multi-payment reform.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Predicting 30-day readmission using DRG-based hospitalization data: a large real-world logistic regression model from a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning models incorporating somatic and mental comorbidities for prolonged length-of-stay prediction in a maximum care university hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants of readmission and death post-stroke using explainable machine learning.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence for early prediction of bloodstream infections using historical electronic health records.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Leveraging machine learning and rule extraction for enhanced transparency in emergency department length of stay prediction.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the predictive capabilities of historical patient records to predict patient adverse outcomes such as mortality, readmission, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS). Methods: Leveraging a de-identified dataset from a tertiary care university hospital, we developed an eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework combining tree-based and traditional machine learning (ML) models with interpretations and statistical analysis of predictors of mortality, readmission, and PLOS. Results: Our framework demonstrated exceptional predictive performance with a notable area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.9625 and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.8575 for 30-day mortality at discharge and an AUROC of 0.9545 and AUPRC of 0.8419 at admission. For the readmission and PLOS risk, the highest AUROC achieved were 0.8198 and 0.9797, respectively. The tree-based models consistently outperformed the traditional ML models in all 4 prediction tasks. The key predictors were age, derived temporal features, routine laboratory tests, and diagnostic and procedural codes. Conclusion: The study underscores the potential of leveraging medical history for enhanced hospital predictive analytics. We present an accurate and intuitive framework for early warning models that can be easily implemented in the current and developing digital health platforms to predict adverse outcomes accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.