ArticleGland surgery2024
Regulatory frameworks in plastic and cosmetic surgery: a comparative scoping review across Australia, United Kingdom, and Italy.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Medicolegal Challenges of Facial Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Pooled it
- Psycho Dermatological Dimensions of Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Criteria, Treatment Options, and Clinical Outcomes in Dermatological and Cosmetic Surgery Settings.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Medico-legal patterns of cosmetic malpractice: a comparative analysis of complaints and judicial outcomes between licensed and unlicensed providers in Shiraz, Iran.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Litigation in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (1982-2022): Verdicts and Indemnity Across Five Procedures.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Surveillance and Modelling for Counterfeit Botulinum Toxin A: Risk Projection, Patient Safety, and Systemic Reform of Pharmacovigilance.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Blurring Boundary Between Cosmetic Applications and Medical Treatment.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Personalized Damage Assessment in Aesthetic Surgery: Current Trends and the Italian Scenario.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Response to comments made on the topical debate: "In Australia professional registration for qualified medical physicists should be mandated through the Australian health practitioner regulation agency (AHPRA)".Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The regulatory landscape for plastic and cosmetic surgery across the country plays a crucial role in shaping the practices within its premises, ensuring patient safety, and maintaining ethical standards in the medical community. This review examines the distinct regulatory frameworks that govern Australia, United Kingdom (UK), and Italy practices, focusing on the nuances that influence the professional accountability and safety measures in place. Methods: A comprehensive scoping review was conducted, exploring the legal and regulatory frameworks governing plastic and reconstructive surgery in Australia, the UK, and Italy. Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies from infinity to May 2024, which were then analyzed to compare regulatory practices, qualification requirements, and their implications on patient safety and professional accountability. Results: Each country presents a unique set of regulations that reflect their individual medical, legal, and cultural contexts. In Australia, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Medical Board of Australia impose stringent criteria for differentiating between "cosmetic surgeons" and "plastic surgeons". The UK's approach, governed by the General Medical Council (GMC), emphasizes ethical conduct, informed consent, and transparent advertising. Italy's regulatory framework varies slightly with a specific focus on the qualifications and titles of practitioners. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of stringent regulations in plastic and cosmetic surgery, advocating for enhanced regulatory measures and comprehensive education on the qualifications of practitioners. It is imperative that these standards are maintained and adapted as necessary to protect patients in the rapidly evolving landscape of cosmetic and plastic surgery across the different regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.