Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282006›Full record

ReviewPNAS nexus2024

Large mammal behavioral defenses induced by the cues of human predation.

Sandy A Slovikosky, Robert A Montgomery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandy A SlovikoskyDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-4420
Robert A MontgomeryDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-0589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large mammals respond to human hunting via proactive and reactive responses, which can induce subsequent nonconsumptive effects (NCEs). Thus, there is evidence that large mammals exhibit considerable behavioral plasticity in response to human hunting risk. Currently, however, it is unclear which cues of human hunting large mammals may be responding to. We conducted a literature review to quantify the large mammal behavioral responses induced by the cues of human hunting. We detected 106 studies published between 1978 and 2022 of which 34 (32%) included at least one measure of cue, typically visual (

Indexed as

behavioral responsecuehuman huntinglarge mammalsnonconsumptive effect

Identifiers

PMID39282006
PMCPMC11398908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.