ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2024
Does the Timed-Up-and-Go Test Predict Length of Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Study.
Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Status after Ventral Hernia Repair: Longitudinal Trends and the Limits of Improvement.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Trial
- Balance and Mobility in Comparison to Patient-Reported Outcomes-A Longitudinal Evaluation After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rising, but it is not appropriate for all patients. Preoperative patient selection considers medical and social factors but overlooks patients' prior level of physical function. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate if preoperative physical function, measured by the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test, is associated with length of stay (LOS) in patients who underwent primary THA. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using 396 patients who underwent primary THA within a 2-month period at a single institution. Regression analysis evaluated the relationship between preoperative TUG scores and hospital LOS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify a cutoff TUG score associated with LOS longer than 24 hours. Results: Univariate regression analysis of those discharged in less than 24 hours and those discharged in more than 24 hours found lower TUG scores (10.7 vs 13.7, respectively) were associated with patient discharge within 24 hours. Multivariate regression analysis showed a higher TUG score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.99) was associated with decreased odds of discharge within 24 hours. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed on the entire study cohort and the ambulatory surgery group and identified TUG scores of 10.3 and 10.5 seconds, respectively, associated with LOS of less than 24 hours (OR full cohort: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.94-4.71; OR ambulatory surgery: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.90-4.60). Sensitivity and specificity were not sufficient to support the use of these cutoff scores alone in predicting LOS. Conclusion: Although we were unable to establish a cutoff TUG score in patients who underwent primary THA that could determine LOS of more than 24 hours, the preoperative TUG score may be useful as a tool to aid in identifying patients who may require a longer hospital LOS. Further study is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.