ArticleACS omega2024
Power Dissipation of Uniaxial Anisotropic/Interacting Polar Molecules with Linear Reaction Dynamics in an Alternating Electric Field.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The influence of anisotropic potential energy and interaction between polar molecules on power absorption in chemical reactions with linear reaction dynamics in a weak alternating electric field is studied theoretically according to the reaction-diffusion equation. The expression for transient power loss is derived using two methods, electrodynamic method and equivalent circuit method, based on the electric energy conservation equation. Numerical calculations are carried out, and the results show that both the anisotropic potential energy and the interaction between polar molecules have a strong impact on energy dissipation and storage. For the anisotropic potential energy, when the applied dimensionless anisotropy is equal to 1, the power loss density increases about 32% at a low reaction rate and 27% at a high reaction rate compared to the case without anisotropic potential energy. When the dimensionless anisotropy is equal to -1, the power loss is suppressed and is reduced about 27% and 24% at low and high reaction rates, respectively. On the other hand, for the interaction between polar molecules, the power loss density decreases about 10% and 30% with low and high interaction potential energies, respectively. In addition, if the reaction rate is relatively high, the power loss will quickly decrease due to the end of the reaction process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.