Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281874›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design.

Katelin Hoskins, Melissa Maye, Leslie Wright, Shari Jager-Hyman, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Brian Ahmedani, Jennifer M Boggs, Christina Johnson, Kristin Linn, LeeAnn Quintana and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katelin HoskinsUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-2848
Melissa MayeHenry Ford Health System.
Leslie WrightKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research.
Shari Jager-HymanUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Courtney Benjamin WolkUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Brian AhmedaniHenry Ford Health System.
Jennifer M BoggsKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research.
Christina JohnsonNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Kristin LinnUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
LeeAnn QuintanaKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research.
Celeste PappasHenry Ford Health System.
Rinad S BeidasNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Funding

SSRI's and SuicidalityU19MH092201 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2010 to 2018
$19.5M
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Strategies to Implement Firearm Safety Promotion as a Universal Suicide Prevention Strategy in Pediatric Primary CareR01MH123491 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
The academic-community experience (ACE): A postdoctoral training fellowship in implementation science to promote mental healthT32MH109433 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David S Mandell · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123491NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109433NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH092201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementation strategies are potential tools for advancing equity goals in healthcare. Implementation scientists have increased attention to the integration of equity considerations into implementation research, but limited concrete guidance is available for developing implementation strategies to improve equity. Main: In parallel to an active hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in two large health systems, our research team explored potential inequities in implementation across four non-study clinics, developed equity focused audit and feedback procedures, examined the feasibility of our approach, and identified design insights that could be tested in future work to inform equitable program scale-up. Based on our experiences deploying these strategies in pilot format, our research team identified key complexities meriting further examination in future work. These considerations are vital given the dearth of guidance on delivering feedback to clinicians in efforts to improve equity. Key takeaways include the importance of understanding local data culture, engaging constituents in co-design for the full feedback cycle, leveraging feedback for shared discourse, and centering multi-level strategies as part of robust implementation approaches. Conclusion: Prioritizing health equity in implementation science requires that research teams probe, interrogate, and innovate - and in doing so, grapple with central conceptual and pragmatic considerations that arise in the design of implementation strategies. Our work emphasizes the value of bidirectional and continuous learning.

Indexed as

audit and feedbackfacilitationhealth equityhybrid effectiveness-implementation trialimplementation strategy

Identifiers

PMID39281874
PMCPMC11398564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.