ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602024
Burden of Bowel Urgency in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Real-World Global Study.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bowel urgency in inflammatory bowel disease: A concept analysis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- Bowel urgency in ulcerative colitis is associated with clinical endpoints, health-related quality of life, and biomarkers: data from the etrasimod ELEVATE UC 52 trial.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Bowel Urgency Improvement Correlates With Clinical, Biochemical, and Intestinal Ultrasound Improvements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross Sectional Multicenter Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Broad Impact of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: US, European, and Japanese Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives from the Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bowel urgency is a highly disruptive and bothersome symptom experienced by patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), (ulcerative colitis [UC], and Crohn's disease [CD]). However, the burden of bowel urgency among patients with varying experiences in targeted treatment has not been consistently assessed. This real-world study explored the clinical and health-related quality of life burden of bowel urgency among patients with IBD with differing treatment experiences. Methods: This cross-sectional survey included gastroenterologists and their patients with IBD across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States treated for over 3 months. Physicians provided patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment history. Patients reported their health-related quality of life and work productivity. Patients with UC and CD were analyzed separately and stratified into 3 groups: Targeted therapy naïve, those receiving their first-line targeted therapy, and targeted therapy experienced. Results: This study found that 17%-26% of UC and 13%-17% of CD patients experienced persistent bowel urgency, irrespective of receiving conventional or targeted therapy. Moreover, patients with bowel urgency experienced an increased clinical and health-related quality of life burden compared to patients without bowel urgency, which physicians most commonly regarded as one of the most difficult symptoms to treat, with the burden remaining substantial irrespective of their treatment experience. Conclusions: Despite several current treatment options, new therapeutic strategies are necessary to provide relief from bowel urgency, one of the most challenging symptoms for people living with IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.