ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combining with Detection of Serum HE4, TSGF, and CD105 Levels in Diagnosis and Treatment of Moderate to Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combining with detection of serum HE4, TSGF, and CD105 levels in diagnosis and treatment of moderate to advanced cervical cancer. Methods: By means of retrospective study, 50 patients diagnosed with moderate to advanced cervical cancer by cervix biopsy pathology examination in our hospital from October 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the study group, and another 50 healthy individuals who did not have cervical cancer after routine gynecological examination and conventional ultrasound examination in the same period were selected as the control group. At the time of enrollment and 3 months after treatment, all study subjects received MRI examination and serological examination, and their HE4 and TSGF levels were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chromatography method, respectively, and additionally, the immunohistochemistry SP method was adopted for patients in the study group to measure the microvessel density (MVD) marked by CD105. The relationship between MRI staging and FIGO staging was assessed, the efficacy of combining MRI with detection of serum HE4, TSGF, and CD105 levels in diagnosing moderate to advanced cervical cancer was calculated by plotting the ROC curve, and the imaging changes and serological changes of tumor tissue before and after treatment were analyzed. Results: There were 3 of 4 patients in stage IIa and 14 of 15 patients in stage IIIb presenting MRI findings compatible with clinical examinations; 26 patients in stage IIb and 5 patients in stage IVb presenting MRI findings totally compatible with clinical examination. Before treatment, MRI finding of cervical lesion was irregular soft tissue mass, T Conclusion: MRI staging is objective and accurate and has higher sensitivity when combined with serum HE4, TSGF, and CD105 levels in diagnosing moderate to advanced cervical cancer. All MRI, HE4, and TSGF can reflect the treatment effect of patients and are of great importance to efficacy assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.